

Get a personalized demo of Stuut and see how it can help with AR automation.
Comparing AR platforms by feature lists is a mistake. Two platforms can both claim "automated collections" while one sends a dunning email when your collector clicks "send" and the other contacts the right billing contact, adjusts tone by customer history, and follows up across email, SMS, and voice without any human action at all. The execution model behind each feature determines your DSO outcome, and that's the lens this checklist applies.
It gives you specific criteria, targeted vendor questions, and a structured scoring approach designed for AR Directors who need to move fast, bring the Controller on board, and present a number-backed ROI to the CFO.
Legacy AR implementations can take 4-6 months to go live, and by the time the system is running, the DSO problem you bought it to solve has compounded. That's the first failure mode, and the second is subtler: many platforms solve the wrong problem entirely by organizing work instead of executing it.
Workflow tools give your team better dashboards while leaving the manual work unchanged. Your collectors still decide which accounts to contact, compose messages, and log into customer portals. The software just gives them a cleaner interface to track the same tasks. That architectural choice caps your DSO improvement at whatever your team can manually execute across a growing portfolio.
Autonomous execution, as a design principle, means the AI agent does the task, not just flags it. As Andreessen Horowitz described when leading Stuut's Series A, the platform handles proactive outreach before invoices go overdue, portal logins to Ariba and Coupa, payment matching against the ERP subledger in real time, and deduction investigation without human input.
The outcomes follow from the architecture. PerkinElmer reduced overdue invoices from 50% to 15% in one year, unlocking $300M in cash flow that funded two acquisitions. Bishop Lifting reduced overdue receivables by 35% and improved DSO by two days across 45 branches, as Jeff Martini, CFO at Bishop Lifting, confirmed in a discussion about AI transforming collections.
"Stuut is transforming our accounts receivable operations on a daily basis. We're collecting faster from the in-scope customers, our cash flow is improving, and our team has more time to focus on white gloves service for top customers. The platform handles the routine work so our people drive increased real business value." - Razvan Bratu, Head of Quote to Cash at Honeywell, as quoted in Fintech Global
One constraint worth naming upfront: autonomous execution still requires human judgment for complex disputes, legal escalations, and accounts in genuine financial distress. Stuut escalates those cases automatically, but your team stays responsible for resolution.
Before you open a spreadsheet or attend a demo, work through these four steps in order. Skipping to demos before you define scope is the most common reason evaluations stall or produce a recommendation the CFO rejects.
Score each vendor 1-to-5 per criterion and weight the six categories based on your priorities. A decision matrix template is available for download at the bottom of this page.
This category determines how much work the platform executes versus how much it hands back to your team.
This is the category your Controller and IT team will gate on. A platform requiring ERP customization or a multi-month IT project creates three problems: it delays value, consumes IT bandwidth, and raises implementation failure risk.
For context on how integration requirements differ across the platform landscape, our HighRadius alternatives guide covers integration architecture across major vendors.
Subscription pricing is the smallest part of your actual cost. TCO captures every expense over an asset's lifespan, and for AR platforms, hidden costs can add 15-20% or more to the sticker price before you count internal labor.
Build your TCO model across four buckets:
CIO.com recommends a 3-5 year window for technology TCO forecasts, which matters when comparing a six-month traditional implementation against a 10-day go-live that starts delivering results in the first quarter. According to industry analysis, companies focused only on sticker price may see total costs rise by 15-20% once invisible expenses appear. For a detailed comparison of pricing models, see our HighRadius pricing breakdown.
Manufacturing and distribution AR has distinct complexity that general-purpose platforms handle poorly.
Vague answers to these questions indicate a workflow tool dressed up with AI language rather than genuine autonomous execution.
Functionality:
Integration:
Support and implementation:
Security and compliance:
Use this table as a template in your CFO presentation, replacing the first two column headers (Legacy workflow tool, Basic automation) with the actual vendors you're evaluating. A critical differentiator is often architecture, not feature lists.
The key architectural question this table forces: does the platform execute the work or organize it for your team to finish? That answer determines whether your DSO moves 5 days or 15 days in the first year. Our order-to-cash platform comparison guide covers the full vendor landscape with the same architectural lens.
Purpose and scope: The checklist covers 40 criteria across six categories: autonomous functionality, ERP integration, TCO, industry-specific capabilities, security and compliance, and vendor support. It's built for mid-market AR Directors comparing 2-4 vendors before building a CFO business case.
Fill-in fields: Each criterion includes a 1-5 score field, a notes column for vendor-specific evidence (screenshots, reference quotes, contract terms), and a category weight you set based on your priorities. If ERP integration speed is your primary constraint, weight that category at 30%. If deductions management drives your ROI case, weight industry-specific capabilities higher.
Usage instructions:
Update cadence: Review checklist criteria against current vendor capabilities every 12 months, or immediately after any vendor announces a significant product change.
Run this checklist against every vendor on your shortlist and bring the scored matrix to your CFO with specific numbers behind each recommendation. The framework that wins isn't the one with the most features checked, it's the one that shows working autonomous execution in your ERP environment, handling your account types and deduction complexity, before you sign.
Download the AR Platform Evaluation Checklist or see the Bishop Lifting case study to understand what autonomous execution looks like across 45 branches in a manufacturing environment.
How long does ERP integration take with Stuut?
Standard SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, and Dynamics configurations connect via API in 3-4 days without modifying ERP structure. Full go-live, including testing and configuration, targets completion in under two weeks for standard environments.
What cash application match rate should I require from any AR vendor?
Require documented evidence of 90%+ match rates from live customer environments, not demo scenarios. Ask specifically how the platform handles short-pays and partial payments, since those edge cases determine whether your team still manually reconciles exceptions.
What does a complete TCO calculation include for AR software?
TCO covers subscription fees, implementation costs, internal IT hours, AR team training time, and the opportunity cost of delayed value from a slow deployment. Use a 3-5 year forecast window to capture renewal pricing and scaling costs accurately.
How do I calculate the payback period for my CFO business case?
Divide total first-year cost (all-in, including internal labor) by monthly cash flow improvement from DSO reduction. For a concrete calculation, use your actual annual revenue divided by 365 to get daily revenue, then multiply by the number of DSO days you expect to recover.
Autonomous collections: AI-executed outreach, follow-up, and escalation across email, SMS, and voice without a human triggering each action. Contrasts with workflow automation, where rules fire only after a collector initiates a step.
API integration: A direct, real-time connection between two software systems using documented interfaces. In AR, this means the platform reads invoice data from your ERP and writes cash application entries back without batch file transfers or manual reconciliation.
Cash application match rate: The percentage of incoming payments automatically matched to the correct invoices without human intervention. Rates above 90% eliminate the payment matching backlog that delays month-end close.
Total cost of ownership (TCO): The complete cost of acquiring, implementing, running, and retiring a software platform over a defined period (typically 3-5 years). Includes subscription fees, implementation labor, internal IT and AR team time, and opportunity costs from delayed deployment.
Days Sales Outstanding (DSO): The average number of days to collect payment after an invoice is issued, calculated as (accounts receivable / total credit sales) x number of days in the period. Every day of DSO reduction represents cash freed from receivables and available for operations.
Collection Effectiveness Index (CEI): The percentage of available receivables collected in a given period, measuring how effectively the AR team converts outstanding invoices to cash. Benchmark your current CEI before evaluating any platform to measure impact accurately.
